Major Mohit Sharma’s family has rushed to the Delhi High Court, trying to put the brakes on Ranveer Singh’s new film, Dhurandhar. They say the movie uses their late son’s story, Ashoka Chakra winner, celebrated Army officer, without their permission and with no concern for accuracy or security. The filmmakers? They flat-out deny it. Here’s what’s actually going on, what both sides are saying, and why it’s turning into such a big deal.

What happened?
First, the basics. Major Sharma’s parents and legal heirs have filed a petition asking the court to stop Dhurandhar’s release immediately. According to them, the film exploits their son’s life, twisting facts and ignoring both their consent and any concern for sensitive military information.

Who is involved?

Who’s in the crosshairs? The petition targets the film’s makers, the production team, and even questions how the Central Board of Film Certification and the Ministry of Information and Broadcasting allowed this to get so far. They also mention the Indian Army, since the movie allegedly pulls from real military events and undercover missions.

The family’s core claims

So, what exactly is the family asking for? According to their petition and media coverage, they want three things:
- A court order halting the film’s release until the judges can look at what it actually contains.
- A private screening so they can see the film and voice any objections before it hits theaters.
- A legal rule requiring filmmakers to get permission from families, and talk to defense officials, before making movies that draw directly from the lives of real servicemen.

What the filmmakers say?

On the other side, Dhurandhar’s director Aditya Dhar and his team insist there’s no connection. They say the film is pure fiction, and any resemblance to real people or events is just coincidence. Dhar has gone on record: if he ever made a biopic about Major Sharma, he’d get the family’s blessing first.

Why this matters legally and ethically?

But the whole thing isn’t just about one movie. Legally and ethically, it’s a minefield. The family’s petition raises big questions:
- Privacy and publicity: Does showing a real person’s life, especially someone who’s gone, without consent cross a line? Families say yes; it’s not just about rights, it’s about pain.
- Defamation and accuracy: If a film distorts true events, it can trash a reputation. Heirs might claim real harm.
- Security: Movies that dip into undercover ops or counterinsurgency risk exposing sensitive details. The petition even points to worries about national security.

Timeline and immediate stakes

Timing matters, too. Dhurandhar is supposed to release in early December 2025. The family’s legal move comes just days before the premiere, so the court has to move fast if it wants to actually make a difference. Reporters covering the case highlight just how urgent things feel.

What happens next? A few scenarios:
- The court could freeze the release and let the family screen the film privately.
- Or, the judges might let the film come out anyway while the bigger legal fight drags on.
- There’s always the chance for an out-of-court deal: maybe the filmmakers add credits, disclaimers, or promise to consult families in the future.

Broader implications for filmmakers and families

Zooming out, this fight is part of a bigger struggle in Indian cinema. Filmmakers want creative freedom, but families want respect, and maybe a say, when their loved ones’ stories hit the big screen. Clearer rules would help everyone. Things like getting consent, using disclaimers, changing key details, or simply talking to families before rolling the cameras can go a long way.

A quick recap:
- The petitioners: Major Mohit Sharma’s parents and legal heirs.
- Who’s named: The Dhurandhar filmmakers, the Ministry of Information and Broadcasting, the Central Board of Film Certification, and the Indian Army.
- Filmmakers’ stance: Director Aditya Dhar says the film isn’t about Major Sharma, period.
- Release date: December 5, 2025.

Conclusion
Major Mohit Sharma’s family has thrown this issue into the spotlight. Even while the Dhurandhar team insists their movie is fiction, the case puts a sharp focus on how filmmakers handle real lives, especially those touched by war and sacrifice. What the court does next won’t just affect one movie; it could set the tone for how Indian films deal with real heroes for years to come. Everyone from filmmakers to lawyers to military families is watching.