In an unprecedented move that has stirred controversy across the South Indian film industry, the makers of "Game Changer," starring Ram Charan, have come under fire for allegedly inflating the film's opening day collections by a staggering margin. Reports and posts on social media suggest that while the film reportedly earned around ₹85-90 crores worldwide on its opening day, the promotional posters claimed an astonishing ₹186 crores, marking a difference of over 100 crores.

This act of boosting collections, often seen in the film industry as a marketing tactic, has typically been limited to a 10-15% increase over actual figures. However, the scale of exaggeration in this case has not only shocked fans but also industry observers, leading to widespread criticism. Many are calling this an "unprecedented" instance of faking in the history of Indian cinema, labeling it as a shameful moment for Telugu cinema in particular.

The backlash on social media platforms has been immediate and intense, with fans and critics alike expressing their disappointment. The consensus among many is that this not only reflects poorly on the film's producers but also dents the credibility of the South Indian film industry as a whole. While inflating box office numbers is not new, such an extreme case raises questions about ethical practices in film promotion and the authenticity of reported earnings.

The controversy has sparked debates about the need for more transparency in how box office collections are reported, with calls for regulatory oversight to prevent such misleading claims in the future. This incident could potentially lead to a reevaluation of how films are marketed and how success is measured in an industry that prides itself on its cultural impact and box office performance.

The fallout from this incident might not just be limited to "Game Changer" but could also set a precedent for how other filmmakers approach promotional strategies, aiming for a more honest representation of their films' performance. Only time will tell how this affects the reputation of those involved and the broader landscape of Indian cinema.